Créditos
Contacto

Calculador de la eficicencia

Calculador de la eficicencia
marSeal

El sistema de sellado marSeal

El sistema de sellado reutilizable marSeal garantiza un sellado seguro de venas, arterias y haces de tejido con ablación subsiguiente.

A la calculadora de la eficicencia de marSeal

ERROR: Content Element with uid "31777" and type "contentelements_electro_calculator" has no rendering definition!

Contenedores de esterilización

Contenedores de esterilización

Nuestros sistemas de envase para suministro estéril sirven al objetivo tanto de maximizar la seguridad del paciente como de optimizar los flujos de trabajo diarios en la Central de Esterilización.

Haga clic aquí para acceder a nuestra calculadora de rentabilidad para nuestras series de envases microStop®, marSafe® y marSafe® plus.

A la calculadora de la eficicencia
Please select a product:
Please select your currency:
Size Number of pieces Price per piece 600x300x110 600x300x160 600x300x270
Size Number of pieces Price per piece 600x300x140 600x300x210
470x300x110 470x300x160
470x300x140
300x300x110 300x300x160 300x300x270
300x300x140 300x300x210
Total price

Notice: Realistic is an avarage of about 120 cycles per year / per container which corresponds to 2.3 cycles per week

Comparison with alternative system

Total costs KLS Martin product

Total costs 5 years

Total costs 10 years

Total costs alternative system

Total costs alternative system 5 years

Total costs alternative system 10 years

Payback period

Years

Weeks

Comparison with soft packaging

Payback period

Years

Weeks

Break even number of containered/wrapped sets:

Sustainable Impact*

Wrapping material

CO₂ Footprint in kg until payback day

CO₂ Footprint in kg in 10 years

Rigid container from KLS Martin

CO₂ Footprint in kg until payback day

CO₂ Footprint in kg in 10 years

The production of a container already causes 30 kg CO₂ footprint before use. This is taken into account in the calculation. 

Total costs of ownership**

Wrapping material two step

TCO until investment payback day

TCO in 5 years

TCO in 10 years

Wrapping material single step

TCO until investment payback day

TCO in 5 years

TCO in 10 years

Rigid container from KLS Martin

TCO until investment payback day

TCO in 5 years

TCO in 10 years

Download results as PDF:

An error occurred and the file could not be downloaded. Please try again later or change your input.

* Friedericy, H. J., van Egmond, C. W., Vogtländer, J. G., van der Eijk, A. C., & Jansen, F. W. (2021).Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable versus Reusable Systems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1), [430]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010430

** Krohn et al., “Analysis of processes and costs of alternative packaging options of sterile goods in hospitals - a case study in two German hospitals”. Health Econ Rev.2019 Jan 17;9(1):1.

This site uses third party website-tracking-technologies to provide their services. I agree and can revoke or change my consent at any time with future effect.

Refuse Settings Accept ImprintPrivacy policy